|
| |||||
| | ||||||
| |||
| I look forward to a full article. This is a really fundamental and important topic that is eluded to, but really neglected by most striper fishing literature. I had to go to trout and salmon fishing books, like you mentioned, before I read things that really got into the meat of it. |
| ||||
| one thing to add right now. if you think of any depression on the shorline be it a rocky hole, trough in a sandbar or etc, think of this as the hole below a waterfall in a trout stream. now i may just be confuseing some people who have never seen a trout stream (i suggest you find the time any stream will do) but you may have noticed that the majority and often the largest fish rarely stage tight to the waterfall unless there is some form of major eddy. more often then not fish stage at the back of the pool where the water is slowest. apply this to your time on the beach. not that casting to the deepest spot of a hole is a waste but if i had the choice i would focus my efforts on the side of a hole opposite the direction of the incoming current. i really need to just spend an hour with paintshop lol |
| ||||
| I know Eddie, he's a great guy! As to the eddie created by structure blocking current this is so true. To add to this, many times a wash out, hole or depression is created on the backside of said hard structure (sometimes soft) in the eddy which adds to or makes the spot more attractive to said ambush fish. They don't have to exert much energy to hold there and have the perfect ambush spot for bait to be swept to them.
__________________ aka In The Surf |
| |||
| Excellent advice given here!! I've never really put it together in those terms but it explains much of my limitted experience. For trout they talk about fishing the "seams" near/between flow. They provide all they need-cover, oxygenated water, and a food supply. I assume the stipers are like trout in that they will always face upstream, but you know what they say about assumption. Thanks for the info guys Hookem |
| |||
| Quote:
That's one assumption that is correct. Except when they are moving and not settled in feeding of course. It would be hard for them to hold position with their tail into the wind. In steady heavy water they hardly have to even move thier tail. They look like birds hovering in the air on a windy day. Thir body shape and pectorals create enough lift for them to hold position without kicking the tail very often. The bigger the fish the happier they are hanging in fast water. Did someone call big fish lazy? I prefer to call them smart and well adjusted. ![]() |
| ||||
| Quote:
right on....again, this conversation about seams needs to be considered in relation to the strength of the current. in high flow areas you really can think of it as if they were trout, hideing behind rocks and tight to seam edges. however, in low flow areas more typical of most of the striper coast, you need to apply these concepts to larger areas....that is the eddie might be from half way down the eastern side of a point to its tip, the entire stretch being good. this brings me to another clarification. most of you are or will soon be aware of back eddies in streams.....areas where a narrow strong current entering a larger body of water causes the water to actually flow in the opposite direction on the outsides of the main flow. while this may create the specific seam we talked about earlier on a larger scale it will cause coves (and sometimes points) to have a flow opposite the general tidal direction. in places like mtk's south side and the points south of the cc canal this can really alter where fish will set up and how you should focus on presenting your plug or bait |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |